COGENCY SEMICONDUCTOR INC.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for COGENCY SEMICONDUCTOR INC..The latest application filed is for "method and apparatus for selecting a responder to enable reliable multicast".
- COGENCY SEMICONDUCTOR INC. - Kanata CA
- Cogency Semiconductor Inc. - Toronto CA
- Cogency Semiconductor Inc. -
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Method and apparatus for selecting a responder to enable reliable multicast App 20040184427 - Lynch, Bradley ; et al. | 2004-09-23 |
| Dual-output direct current voltage converter Grant 6,756,772 - McGinnis June 29, 2 | 2004-06-29 |
| Dual-output direct current voltage converter App 20040004465 - McGinnis, Donald Mike | 2004-01-08 |
| Method and apparatus for detecting a jammed channel in a block oriented digital communication system App 20030235254 - Fanson, John Louis ; et al. | 2003-12-25 |
| Two-stage non-linear filter for analog signal gain control in an OFDM receiver App 20030215032 - Langlais, Brian James ; et al. | 2003-11-20 |
| Block oriented digital communication system and method App 20030198310 - Fanson, John Louis ; et al. | 2003-10-23 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 