Clowers; Earl Roger
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Clowers; Earl Roger.The latest application filed is for "bearing structure for a reciprocating shaft in a reciprocating saw".
- Clowers; Earl Roger - Anderson SC
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Bearing structure for a reciprocating shaft in a reciprocating saw Grant 8,141,444 - Lagaly , et al. March 27, 2 | 2012-03-27 |
| Bearing Structure for a Reciprocating Shaft in a Reciprocating Saw App 20080041174 - Lagaly; Michael ; et al. | 2008-02-21 |
| Bearing structure for a reciprocating shaft in a reciprocating saw App 20080010840 - Lagaly; Michael Anthony ; et al. | 2008-01-17 |
| Reciprocating counterweight structure for a reciprocating saw Grant 7,246,533 - Lagaly , et al. July 24, 2 | 2007-07-24 |
| Bearing structure for a reciprocating shaft in a reciprocating saw App 20040237678 - Lagaly, Michael Anthony ; et al. | 2004-12-02 |
| Bearing structure for a reciprocating shaft in a reciprocating saw Grant 6,810,589 - Lagaly , et al. November 2, 2 | 2004-11-02 |
| Reciprocating saw having compact configuration and independent stability Grant 6,568,089 - Popik , et al. May 27, 2 | 2003-05-27 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 