Trademark applications and grants for Cleveland John. Cleveland John has 1 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "ZIPPY MAPS"
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
TREATMENT OF STK11-LOSS CANCERS 20220110898 - 17/298251 Cress; Douglas W. ;   et al. | 2022-04-14 |
BGA FOOTPRINT PATTERN FOR INCREASING NUMBER OF ROUTING CHANNELS PER PCB LAYER 20110155434 - 12/647737 REYNOV; Boris ;   et al. | 2011-06-30 |
Circuit boards defining regions for controlling a dielectric constant of a dielectric material 8,952,260 - 13/434,386 Reynov , et al. February 10, 2 | 2015-02-10 |
Circuit boards defining regions for controlling a dielectric constant of a dielectric material 8,952,260 - 13/434,386 Reynov , et al. February 10, 2 | 2015-02-10 |
BGA footprint pattern for increasing number of routing channels per PCB layer 8,273,994 - 12/647,737 Reynov , et al. September 25, 2 | 2012-09-25 |
Sinus debrider apparatus 5,957,881 - 08/752,480 Peters , et al. September 28, 1 | 1999-09-28 |
Sinus debrider apparatus 5,685,838 - 08/422,903 Peters , et al. November 11, 1 | 1997-11-11 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
![]() "ZIPPY MAPS" 4143690 85205028 |
ZIPPY MAPS 2010-12-23 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.