Cleary; Thomas J.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Cleary; Thomas J..The latest application filed is for "direct fired heaters including premix burner technology".
- Cleary; Thomas J. - St. Louis County MO
- Cleary; Thomas J. - St. Charles MO
- Cleary; Thomas J. - Roxbury CT
- Cleary; Thomas J. - Milpitas CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Direct fired heaters including premix burner technology Grant 9,188,362 - Potter, Sr. , et al. November 17, 2 | 2015-11-17 |
| Vertical take-off and landing aircraft Grant 9,120,560 - Armer , et al. September 1, 2 | 2015-09-01 |
| Direct Fired Heaters Including Premix Burner Technology App 20140209086 - Potter, SR.; Gary J. ; et al. | 2014-07-31 |
| Application system certification process Grant 7,337,429 - Psaras , et al. February 26, 2 | 2008-02-26 |
| Exclusion of polymer film from semiconductor wafer edge and backside during film (CVD) deposition Grant 6,281,144 - Cleary , et al. August 28, 2 | 2001-08-28 |
| Apparatus for backside and edge exclusion of polymer film during chemical vapor deposition Grant 6,063,202 - Cleary , et al. May 16, 2 | 2000-05-16 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 