Clay; Donald W.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Clay; Donald W..The latest application filed is for "hard disk drive controller employing a plurality of microprocessors".
- Clay; Donald W. - Louisville CO
- Clay; Donald W. - Boulder County CO
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Hard disk drive controller employing a plurality of microprocessors Grant 5,610,808 - Squires , et al. March 11, 1 | 1997-03-11 |
| Disk drive system interface architecture employing state machines Grant 5,465,338 - Clay November 7, 1 | 1995-11-07 |
| Flash solid state drive that emulates a disk drive and stores variable length and fixed lenth data blocks Grant 5,459,850 - Clay , et al. October 17, 1 | 1995-10-17 |
| Disk drive data path integrity control architecture Grant 5,412,666 - Squires , et al. May 2, 1 | 1995-05-02 |
| Flexible host interface controller architecture Grant 5,274,773 - Squires , et al. December 28, 1 | 1993-12-28 |
| Multiple microcontroller hard disk drive control architecture Grant 5,261,058 - Squires , et al. November 9, 1 | 1993-11-09 |
| Optical data format employing resynchronizable data sectors Grant 4,791,622 - Clay , et al. December 13, 1 | 1988-12-13 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 