Clack; Ashley
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Clack; Ashley.The latest application filed is for "termination of a flexible pipe".
- Clack; Ashley - Blyth GB
- Clack; Ashley - Newcastle-upon-Tyne GB
- Clack; Ashley - Blythe GB
- Clack; Ashley - Newcastle Upton Tyne GB
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Apparatus and method for terminating flexible pipe body Grant 11,293,571 - Gray , et al. April 5, 2 | 2022-04-05 |
| Immobilised insert Grant 11,085,561 - Shippen , et al. August 10, 2 | 2021-08-10 |
| Termination Of A Flexible Pipe App 20210207749 - Gray; Christopher ; et al. | 2021-07-08 |
| Sacrificial shielding Grant 10,920,912 - Snowdon , et al. February 16, 2 | 2021-02-16 |
| Method For Terminating Flexible Pipe Body App 20200355306 - Gray; Christopher ; et al. | 2020-11-12 |
| Immobilised Insert App 20190316711 - Shippen; Leigh ; et al. | 2019-10-17 |
| Sacrificial Shielding App 20190219199 - SNOWDON; Paul ; et al. | 2019-07-18 |
| Termination Of A Flexible Pipe App 20180283588 - Gray; Christopher ; et al. | 2018-10-04 |
| Apparatus And Method For Terminating Flexible Pipe Body App 20180128404 - Gray; Christopher ; et al. | 2018-05-10 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 