Citizen Watch Co.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Citizen Watch Co..The latest application filed is for "non-volatile semiconductor memory device having electrically programable memory matrix array".
- Citizen Watch Co. - Tokyo JP
- Citizen Watch Company - Tokyo JP
- CITIZEN WATCH CO. -
- Citizen Watch Co. - Okayama JP
- Citizen Watch Co. - Ltd. Tokyo
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Optical printer head having liquid crystal shutter Grant 7,158,166 - Futakami , et al. January 2, 2 | 2007-01-02 |
| Disk drive for removable disk cartridges and receivable into a PCMCIA port of a computer Grant 6,762,906 - Wakita , et al. July 13, 2 | 2004-07-13 |
| Non-volatile Semiconductor Memory Device Having Electrically Programable Memory Matrix Array App 20010014031 - TANAKA, TOSHIAKI | 2001-08-16 |
| Wrist watch case Grant D382,491 - Tonohori August 19, 1 | 1997-08-19 |
| Buckle for watch bands Grant 5,313,691 - Hashimoto May 24, 1 | 1994-05-24 |
| Liquid crystal display device and retardation film Grant 5,093,739 - Aida , et al. March 3, 1 | 1992-03-03 |
| Machine Tool Grant 3,688,612 - September 5, 1 | 1972-09-05 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 