Trademark applications and grants for Chrimar Systems, Inc. Chrimar Systems, Inc has 3 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "NOTELOCK"
State Incorporated | MICHIGAN |
Entity Type | CORPORATION |
Address | 13955 Farmington Road Livonia, MICHIGAN UNITED STATES 48154 |
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
ETHERNET DEVICE 20150263467 - 14/726940 AUSTERMANN, III; JOHN F. ;   et al. | 2015-09-17 |
CENTRAL PIECE OF NETWORK EQUIPMENT 20150236873 - 14/695456 AUSTERMANN, III; JOHN F. ;   et al. | 2015-08-20 |
ETHERNET CENTRAL STATION 20130010846 - 13/615734 Austermann, III; John F. ;   et al. | 2013-01-10 |
ETHERNET END STATION 20130002369 - 13/615726 Austermann, III; John F. ;   et al. | 2013-01-03 |
ETHERNET SYSTEM 20130002047 - 13/615755 Austermann, III; John F. ;   et al. | 2013-01-03 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
![]() "NOTELOCK" 75562169 |
NOTELOCK 1998-09-30 |
![]() "SIMMLOCK" 75561806 |
SIMMLOCK 1998-09-30 |
![]() "ETHERLOCK" 2426086 75561816 |
ETHERLOCK 1998-09-30 |
NCAGE Code | 09MP0 | CHRIMAR SYSTEMS INC |
CAGE Code | 09MP0 | CHRIMAR SYSTEMS INC CMS TECHNOLOGIES |
SEC | 0000947665 | CHRIMAR SYSTEMS INC |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.