loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Chou; Chih-Ming.The latest application filed is for "semiconductor package and method for discharging electronic devices on a substrate".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
In vivo assay for neurite outgrowth in zebrafish and its application in drug screening Grant 7,671,251 - Chou , et al. March 2, 2 | 2010-03-02 |
Semiconductor Package And Method For Discharging Electronic Devices On A Substrate App 20080304245 - CHOU; Chih Ming ;   et al. | 2008-12-11 |
Heat Block App 20080230531 - CHOU; CHIH-MING ;   et al. | 2008-09-25 |
System and method for data communication handoff across heterogenous wireless networks Grant 7,206,301 - Wu , et al. April 17, 2 | 2007-04-17 |
In vivo assay for neurite outgrowth in zebrafish and its application in drug screening App 20060179506 - Chou; Chih-Ming ;   et al. | 2006-08-10 |
Detection of coronavirus infection App 20060057161 - Huang; Chang-Jen ;   et al. | 2006-03-16 |
System and method for data communication handoff across heterogeneous wireless networks App 20050122941 - Wu, Po-Chung ;   et al. | 2005-06-09 |
Oligonucleotides for detection of baculovirus infection Grant 5,521,299 - Wang , et al. May 28, 1 | 1996-05-28 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.