Choolani; Mahesh
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Choolani; Mahesh.The latest application filed is for "wound dressing nanomesh impregnated with human umbilical cord wharton's jelly stem cells".
- Choolani; Mahesh - Singapore SG
- Choolani, Mahesh - London GB
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Wound dressing nanomesh impregnated with human umbilical cord Wharton's jelly stem cells Grant 10,413,574 - Fong , et al. Sept | 2019-09-17 |
| Method of identifying, isolating and/or culturing foetal erythroblasts Grant 9,910,032 - Fong , et al. March 6, 2 | 2018-03-06 |
| Wound Dressing Nanomesh Impregnated with Human Umbilical Cord Wharton's Jelly Stem Cells App 20150352157 - Fong; Chui Yee ; et al. | 2015-12-10 |
| Method Of Identifying Foetal Erythroblast App 20150140555 - Choolani; Mahesh ; et al. | 2015-05-21 |
| Foetal Nucleated Red Blood Cell Detection App 20140141997 - Mahyuddin; Aniza Puteri ; et al. | 2014-05-22 |
| Method Of Identifying, Isolating And/or Culturing Foetal Erythroblasts App 20140030724 - Fong; Chui Yee ; et al. | 2014-01-30 |
| Simultaneous determination of phenotype and genotype App 20030036100 - Fisk, Nicholas Maxwell ; et al. | 2003-02-20 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 