Choo; Lay Cheng
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Choo; Lay Cheng.The latest application filed is for "flip-chip optoelectronic device".
- Choo; Lay Cheng - Singapore SG
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Flip-chip Optoelectronic Device App 20220231477 - Lam; Yee Loy ; et al. | 2022-07-21 |
| Application of single exposure alternating aperture phase shift mask to form sub 0.18 micron polysilicon gates App 20060194397 - Choo; Lay Cheng ; et al. | 2006-08-31 |
| Application of single exposure alternating aperture phase shift mask to form sub 0.18 micron polysilicon gates Grant 7,037,791 - Choo , et al. May 2, 2 | 2006-05-02 |
| Optical probe for wafer scale testing of light-electrical (l-i-v) performance of opto electronic devices App 20050047715 - Lam, Yee Loy ; et al. | 2005-03-03 |
| Two-section distributed Bragg reflector laser Grant 6,807,215 - Lam , et al. October 19, 2 | 2004-10-19 |
| Application of single exposure alternating aperture phase shift mask to form sub 0.18 micron polysilicon gates App 20030203580 - Choo, Lay Cheng ; et al. | 2003-10-30 |
| Two-section distributed Bragg reflector laser App 20030072344 - Lam, Yee Loy ; et al. | 2003-04-17 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 