Choi; Damdam
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Choi; Damdam.The latest application filed is for "redox flow battery having electrolyte flow path independently provided therein".
- Choi; Damdam - Daejeon KR
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Redox flow battery having electrolyte flow path independently provided therein Grant 11,431,010 - Kim , et al. August 30, 2 | 2022-08-30 |
| Redox flow battery Grant 11,417,900 - Kim , et al. August 16, 2 | 2022-08-16 |
| Redox Flow Battery Having Electrolyte Flow Path Independently Provided Therein App 20200388867 - Kim; Bugi ; et al. | 2020-12-10 |
| Redox Flow Battery App 20200365927 - Kim; Bugi ; et al. | 2020-11-19 |
| Redox Flow Battery App 20200287226 - Kim; Bugi ; et al. | 2020-09-10 |
| Redox flow battery Grant 10,665,882 - Kim , et al. | 2020-05-26 |
| Redox flow battery Grant 10,090,550 - Cho , et al. October 2, 2 | 2018-10-02 |
| Redox Flow Battery App 20180269514 - KIM; Bugi ; et al. | 2018-09-20 |
| Bipolar Plate For Battery And Redox Flow Battery Or Fuel Cell Having The Same App 20180006314 - KIM; Bu Gi ; et al. | 2018-01-04 |
| Redox Flow Battery App 20170301943 - CHO; Bumhee ; et al. | 2017-10-19 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 