loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Chodorow; Marvin.The latest application filed is for "fiber optic amplifier".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Fiber optic amplifier Grant 4,546,476 - Shaw , et al. October 8, 1 | 1985-10-08 |
Stabilized fiber optic sensor Grant 4,530,603 - Shaw , et al. July 23, 1 | 1985-07-23 |
Brillouin ring laser Grant 4,530,097 - Stokes , et al. July 16, 1 | 1985-07-16 |
Fiber optic amplifier Grant 4,515,431 - Shaw , et al. May 7, 1 | 1985-05-07 |
Electron tube with transverse cyclotron interaction Grant 4,513,223 - Chodorow April 23, 1 | 1985-04-23 |
Fiber optic resonator Grant 4,469,397 - Shaw , et al. September 4, 1 | 1984-09-04 |
Mode suppression means for gyrotron cavities Grant 4,398,121 - Chodorow , et al. August 9, 1 | 1983-08-09 |
Fiber optic rotation sensing interferometer Grant 4,323,310 - Shaw , et al. April 6, 1 | 1982-04-06 |
Method of and apparatus for acoustic imaging Grant 4,012,950 - Kompfner , et al. March 22, 1 | 1977-03-22 |
Method Of And Apparatus For Particle Detection And Identification Grant 3,774,717 - Chodorow November 27, 1 | 1973-11-27 |
Means For Avoiding Locking In Ring Lasers Grant 3,627,422 - Chodorow December 14, 1 | 1971-12-14 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.