Chi; Baoyong
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Chi; Baoyong.The latest application filed is for "prescaler".
- Chi; Baoyong - Beijing CN
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Prescaler Grant 7,248,665 - Shi , et al. July 24, 2 | 2007-07-24 |
| Prescaler App 20060245534 - Shi; Bingxue ; et al. | 2006-11-02 |
| Flipflop Grant 7,057,421 - Shi , et al. June 6, 2 | 2006-06-06 |
| Down-converter using an on-chip bias circuit for enhancing symmetry and linearity and testing device thereof Grant 7,049,878 - Shi , et al. May 23, 2 | 2006-05-23 |
| Quadrature VCO using symmetrical spiral inductors and differential varactors Grant 7,026,880 - Shi , et al. April 11, 2 | 2006-04-11 |
| Down-converter using an on-chip bias circuit for enhancing symmetry and linearity and testing device thereof App 20050270081 - Shi, Bingxue ; et al. | 2005-12-08 |
| Quadrature VCO using symmetrical spiral inductors and differential varactors App 20050253660 - Shi, Bingxue ; et al. | 2005-11-17 |
| Flipflop App 20050237096 - Shi, Bingxue ; et al. | 2005-10-27 |
| 2/3 full-speed divider using phase-switching technique Grant 6,614,274 - Shi , et al. September 2, 2 | 2003-09-02 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 