Chhetri; Amit
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Chhetri; Amit.The latest application filed is for "system and process for regression-based residual acoustic echo suppression".
- Chhetri; Amit - Sunnyvale CA
- Chhetri; Amit - Santa Clara CA
- Chhetri; Amit - Tempe AZ
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Autonomously motile device with acoustic echo cancellation Grant 11,205,438 - Chhetri December 21, 2 | 2021-12-21 |
| Autonomously motile device with beamforming Grant 11,159,878 - Chatlani , et al. October 26, 2 | 2021-10-26 |
| Attenuation of output audio based on residual echo Grant 9,319,783 - Barton , et al. April 19, 2 | 2016-04-19 |
| System and process for regression-based residual acoustic echo suppression Grant 8,416,946 - Chhetri , et al. April 9, 2 | 2013-04-09 |
| Adaptive acoustic echo cancellation Grant 8,275,120 - Stokes, III , et al. September 25, 2 | 2012-09-25 |
| System And Process For Regression-based Residual Acoustic Echo Suppression App 20110013781 - Chhetri; Amit ; et al. | 2011-01-20 |
| System and process for regression-based residual acoustic echo suppression Grant 7,813,499 - Chhetri , et al. October 12, 2 | 2010-10-12 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 