Cheng; Wheling
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Cheng; Wheling.The latest application filed is for "method for fabricating a printed circuit board having a coaxial via".
- Cheng; Wheling - Palo Alto CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Method for fabricating a printed circuit board having a coaxial via Grant 8,035,038 - Cheng , et al. October 11, 2 | 2011-10-11 |
| Method and system to optimize timing margin in a system in package module Grant 7,574,687 - Camerlo , et al. August 11, 2 | 2009-08-11 |
| Method For Fabricating A Printed Circuit Board Having A Coaxial Via App 20080185180 - Cheng; Wheling ; et al. | 2008-08-07 |
| Method for fabricating a printed circuit board having a coaxial via Grant 7,404,250 - Cheng , et al. July 29, 2 | 2008-07-29 |
| Coaxial via in PCB for high-speed signaling designs App 20070124930 - Cheng; Wheling ; et al. | 2007-06-07 |
| Methods and apparatus for testing a circuit board using a surface mountable adaptor Grant 6,906,544 - Shanker , et al. June 14, 2 | 2005-06-14 |
| Semiconductor package having capacitive extension spokes and method for making the same Grant 5,903,050 - Thurairajaratnam , et al. May 11, 1 | 1999-05-11 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 