loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Cheng; Tai C..The latest application filed is for "high frequency alternating current medical device with self-limiting conductive material and method".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
High frequency alternating current medical device with self-limiting conductive material and method Grant 8,512,335 - Cheng , et al. August 20, 2 | 2013-08-20 |
High Frequency Alternating Current Medical Device With Self-limiting Conductive Material And Method App 20110288543 - Cheng; Elbert T. ;   et al. | 2011-11-24 |
Balloons for medical catheters Grant 5,849,846 - Chen , et al. December 15, 1 | 1998-12-15 |
Intraluminal catheter with high strength proximal shaft Grant 5,554,121 - Ainsworth , et al. September 10, 1 | 1996-09-10 |
PTC conductive polymer compositions containing high molecular weight polymer materials Grant 5,554,679 - Cheng September 10, 1 | 1996-09-10 |
Polymeric blends Grant 4,935,467 - Cheng , et al. June 19, 1 | 1990-06-19 |
Poly(aryl ether ketone) compositions Grant 4,879,338 - Mercer , et al. November 7, 1 | 1989-11-07 |
Conductive polymers exhibiting PTC characteristics Grant 4,514,620 - Cheng , et al. April 30, 1 | 1985-04-30 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.