Chen; Lifang
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Chen; Lifang.The latest application filed is for "fenton-like catalytic material with dual reaction centers and preparation method thereof".
- Chen; Lifang - Shenzhen CN
- Chen; Lifang - Nanjing CN
- Chen; Lifang - Shanghai CN
Trademarks
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| UV light sanitizer Grant D928,340 - Chen August 17, 2 | 2021-08-17 |
| Fenton-like catalytic material with dual reaction centers and preparation method thereof Grant 11,065,610 - Wang , et al. July 20, 2 | 2021-07-20 |
| Fenton-like Catalytic Material with Dual Reaction Centers and Preparation Method Thereof App 20210023545 - WANG; Jinnan ; et al. | 2021-01-28 |
| Rotary Ring Support App 20180359346 - CHEN; Lifang | 2018-12-13 |
| ZnO structures and methods of use Grant 9,194,054 - Richards , et al. November 24, 2 | 2015-11-24 |
| ZnO STRUCTURES AND METHODS OF USE App 20140331916 - RICHARDS; Ryan M. ; et al. | 2014-11-13 |
| ZnO structures and methods of use Grant 8,790,614 - Richards , et al. July 29, 2 | 2014-07-29 |
| ZnO Structures and Methods of Use App 20100284893 - RICHARDS; Ryan M. ; et al. | 2010-11-11 |
| SEC | 0001387543 | CHEN LIFANG |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 