loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Chaulet; Christelle.The latest application filed is for "tire comprising carcass reinforcement wires having different previousnesses".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Tire comprising carcass reinforcement wires having different perviousnesses Grant 9,033,016 - Domingo , et al. May 19, 2 | 2015-05-19 |
Tire for heavy vehicles, with a crown reinforcement comprising at least one layer of circumferential reinforcing elements Grant 8,770,246 - Chaulet , et al. July 8, 2 | 2014-07-08 |
Tire Comprising Carcass Reinforcement Wires Having Different Previousnesses App 20120285602 - Domingo; Alain ;   et al. | 2012-11-15 |
Comprising Casing Reinforcement Cables Having a Low Perviousness, and Variable Rubber Mixture Thickness App 20120261046 - Domingo; Alain ;   et al. | 2012-10-18 |
Tire for Heavy Vehicles, with a Crown Reinforcement Comprising at Least One Layer of Circumferential Reinforcing Elements App 20110308686 - Chaulet; Christelle ;   et al. | 2011-12-22 |
Tire Comprising Low Permeability Carcass Reinforcing Cables and Reduced Thicknesses of Rubber Compounds App 20110308689 - Domingo; Alain ;   et al. | 2011-12-22 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.