loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Chapman; Troy.The latest application filed is for "occlusive implants with fiber-based release structures".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Occlusive Implants With Fiber-based Release Structures App 20220304697 - Mirigian; Greg ;   et al. | 2022-09-29 |
Occlusive implants with fiber-based release structures Grant 11,389,170 - Mirigian , et al. July 19, 2 | 2022-07-19 |
Occlusive Implants With Fiber-based Release Structures App 20190314033 - Mirigian; Greg ;   et al. | 2019-10-17 |
Perfusion-occlusion apparatus and methods App 20020042625 - Stack, Richard S. ;   et al. | 2002-04-11 |
Anastomosis device and method Grant 6,176,864 - Chapman January 23, 2 | 2001-01-23 |
Perfusion-occlusion apparatus Grant 6,165,196 - Stack , et al. December 26, 2 | 2000-12-26 |
Intraluminal shunt and methods of use Grant 6,095,997 - French , et al. August 1, 2 | 2000-08-01 |
Sternal closure device and instruments therefor Grant 6,051,007 - Hogendijk , et al. April 18, 2 | 2000-04-18 |
NCAGE Code | 6K6V9 | CHAPMAN, TROY DBA CHAPMAN MASONRY |
CAGE Code | 6K6V9 | CHAPMAN, TROY CHAPMAN MASONRY |
DUNS | 829909097 | CHAPMAN, TROY |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.