Chang; Ming-Sheng
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Chang; Ming-Sheng.The latest application filed is for "robotic system having non-planar inner projection of movable mechanism".
- Chang; Ming-Sheng - Taoyuan TW
- Chang; Ming-Sheng - Taipei City TW
- CHANG; Ming-Sheng - Taoyuan City TW
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Vibration isolation apparatus for server rack delivery Grant 11,276,435 - Chen , et al. March 15, 2 | 2022-03-15 |
| Robotic System Having Non-Planar Inner Projection of Movable Mechanism App 20210154855 - Chang; Ming-Sheng ; et al. | 2021-05-27 |
| Vibration Isolation Apparatus For Server Rack Delivery App 20200135239 - CHEN; Chao-Jung ; et al. | 2020-04-30 |
| Hard drive carrier with reduced airflow-induced vibrations Grant 10,102,883 - Chen , et al. October 16, 2 | 2018-10-16 |
| Hard Drive Carrier With Reduced Airflow-induced Vibrations App 20180096709 - CHEN; Chao-Jung ; et al. | 2018-04-05 |
| Multi-level vibration dampening mechanism Grant 9,874,229 - Chen , et al. January 23, 2 | 2018-01-23 |
| Multi-level Vibration Dampening Mechanism App 20160348696 - CHEN; Chao-Jung ; et al. | 2016-12-01 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 