Chandler; Paul E.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Chandler; Paul E..The latest application filed is for "follicular unit harvesting tool".
- Chandler; Paul E. - Santa Cruz CA
- Chandler; Paul E. - Plano TX
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Ultrasound-based neuromodulation system Grant 10,350,440 - Taylor , et al. July 16, 2 | 2019-07-16 |
| Follicular unit harvesting tool Grant 10,010,369 - Chandler , et al. July 3, 2 | 2018-07-03 |
| Follicular Unit Harvesting Tool App 20160317227 - Chandler; Paul E. ; et al. | 2016-11-03 |
| Follicular unit harvesting tool Grant 9,414,889 - Chandler , et al. August 16, 2 | 2016-08-16 |
| Ultrasound-based Neuromodulation System App 20140277033 - Taylor; Kevin ; et al. | 2014-09-18 |
| Follicular Unit Harvesting Tool App 20110060321 - Chandler; Paul E. ; et al. | 2011-03-10 |
| Method and apparatus for displaying articles Grant 6,264,148 - Chandler July 24, 2 | 2001-07-24 |
| Methods and apparatus for ultrasound image quantification Grant 6,258,029 - Guracar , et al. July 10, 2 | 2001-07-10 |
| Method and apparatus for ultrasound image quantification Grant 6,193,664 - Guracar , et al. February 27, 2 | 2001-02-27 |
| Motion--Monitoring method and system for medical devices Grant 6,122,538 - Sliwa, Jr. , et al. September 19, 2 | 2000-09-19 |
| Method and apparatus for ultrasound image quantification Grant 6,110,118 - Guracar , et al. August 29, 2 | 2000-08-29 |
| Ultrasound otoscope Grant 6,093,150 - Chandler , et al. July 25, 2 | 2000-07-25 |
| Method and apparatus for setting the integration interval for time integrated surface integral in an ultrasound imaging system Grant 6,093,149 - Guracar , et al. July 25, 2 | 2000-07-25 |
| Method and apparatus for frequency control of an ultrasound system Grant 6,050,944 - Holley , et al. April 18, 2 | 2000-04-18 |
| Method and apparatus for frequency control of an ultrasound system Grant 6,045,505 - Holley , et al. April 4, 2 | 2000-04-04 |
| Methods and apparatus for ultrasound image quantification Grant 6,030,344 - Guracar , et al. February 29, 2 | 2000-02-29 |
| Ultrasonic method and system for imaging blood flow including disruption or activation of a contrast agent Grant 5,947,904 - Hossack , et al. September 7, 1 | 1999-09-07 |
| Ultrasonic method for imaging blood flow including disruption or activation of contrast agent Grant 5,944,666 - Hossack , et al. August 31, 1 | 1999-08-31 |
| Ultrasound method and system for measuring perfusion Grant 5,860,931 - Chandler January 19, 1 | 1999-01-19 |
| Method and apparatus for mapping pressure and tissue properties Grant 5,749,364 - Sliwa, Jr. , et al. May 12, 1 | 1998-05-12 |
| Display case apparatus Grant 5,316,153 - Crawford , et al. May 31, 1 | 1994-05-31 |
| Variable origin-variable acoustic scanning method and apparatus Grant 5,261,408 - Maslak , et al. November 16, 1 | 1993-11-16 |
| Variable origin-variable angle acoustic scanning method and apparatus for a curved linear array Grant 5,235,986 - Maslak , et al. August 17, 1 | 1993-08-17 |
| Variable origin-variable angle acoustic scanning method and apparatus Grant 5,148,810 - Maslak , et al. September 22, 1 | 1992-09-22 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 