Chandler; Curtis S.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Chandler; Curtis S..The latest application filed is for "latching mechanism for shielded data connector".
- Chandler; Curtis S. - King NC
- Chandler; Curtis S. - Walkertown NC
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Latching mechanism for shielded data connector Grant 5,074,803 - Chandler , et al. December 24, 1 | 1991-12-24 |
| Data distribution panel Grant 4,990,094 - Chandler , et al. February 5, 1 | 1991-02-05 |
| Shielded data connector Grant 4,891,022 - Chandler , et al. January 2, 1 | 1990-01-02 |
| Shielded data connector Grant 4,884,981 - Chandler , et al. December 5, 1 | 1989-12-05 |
| Electrical connector Grant RE32,760 - Chandler , et al. October 4, 1 | 1988-10-04 |
| Electrical connector Grant 4,501,459 - Chandler , et al. February 26, 1 | 1985-02-26 |
| Metal strain relief clamp Grant 4,211,463 - Chandler July 8, 1 | 1980-07-08 |
| Electrical connector assembly retention system Grant 4,130,329 - Chandler , et al. December 19, 1 | 1978-12-19 |
| Electrical connector strain relief and cover retention system Grant 4,130,330 - Chandler December 19, 1 | 1978-12-19 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 