Chai; John Y.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Chai; John Y..The latest application filed is for "apparatus and method for determining obesity-related disease risk indicators of a human subject".
- Chai; John Y. - Hong Kong HK
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Apparatus and method for determining growth status of a human subject Grant 7,910,840 - Chai March 22, 2 | 2011-03-22 |
| Apparatus and methods for monitoring water consumption and filter usage Grant 7,487,677 - Chai , et al. February 10, 2 | 2009-02-10 |
| Apparatus and method for determining growth status of a human subject App 20080179110 - Chai; John Y. | 2008-07-31 |
| Apparatus and method for determining obesity-related disease risk indicators of a human subject App 20080183421 - Chai; John Y. | 2008-07-31 |
| Apparatus and methods for monitoring water consumption and filter usage Grant 7,107,838 - Chai , et al. September 19, 2 | 2006-09-19 |
| Apparatus and methods for monitoring water consumption and filter usage App 20050229700 - Chai, John Y. ; et al. | 2005-10-20 |
| Apparatus and methods for monitoring water consumption and filter usage App 20050229699 - Chai, John Y. ; et al. | 2005-10-20 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 