loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Cavin; Mark S..The latest application filed is for "frequency divider with synchronous range extension across octave boundaries".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Frequency divider with synchronous range extension across octave boundaries Grant 8,552,770 - Cavin October 8, 2 | 2013-10-08 |
Frequency Divider with Synchronous Range Extension Across Octave Boundaries App 20120194220 - Cavin; Mark S. | 2012-08-02 |
Master-slave local oscillator porting between radio integrated circuits Grant 8,023,913 - Cavin September 20, 2 | 2011-09-20 |
Master-slave Local Oscillator Porting Between Radio Integrated Circuits App 20110105054 - Cavin; Mark S. | 2011-05-05 |
Master-slave local oscillator porting between radio integrated circuits Grant 7,869,778 - Cavin January 11, 2 | 2011-01-11 |
Master-slave Local Oscillator Porting Between Radio Integrated Circuits App 20090170448 - Cavin; Mark S. | 2009-07-02 |
Master-slave local oscillator porting between radio integrated circuits Grant 7,499,684 - Cavin March 3, 2 | 2009-03-03 |
Master-Slave Local Oscillator Porting Between Radio Integrated Circuits App 20050064892 - Cavin, Mark S. | 2005-03-24 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.