Case; Clark
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Case; Clark.The latest application filed is for "industrial automation control system content protection".
- Case; Clark - Aurora OH
- Case; Clark - Phoenix AZ
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Industrial automation control system content protection Grant 10,901,393 - Case , et al. January 26, 2 | 2021-01-26 |
| Industrial Automation Control System Content Protection App 20190346821 - Case; Clark ; et al. | 2019-11-14 |
| Industrial automation control system content protection Grant 10,372,104 - Case , et al. | 2019-08-06 |
| Industrial Automation Control System Content Protection App 20160252895 - Case; Clark ; et al. | 2016-09-01 |
| Preemptive change verification via electronic signatures in industrial automation systems Grant 8,031,913 - Case October 4, 2 | 2011-10-04 |
| Systems and methods for queuing an action in industrial automation systems Grant 7,979,706 - Case July 12, 2 | 2011-07-12 |
| Systems and methods providing distributed management of electronic signatures in industrial automation systems Grant 7,861,085 - Case , et al. December 28, 2 | 2010-12-28 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 