loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Carter; Clyde T..The latest application filed is for "low insertion force electrical socket contact".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Electrical socket contact with tines Grant 6,899,572 - Baker , et al. May 31, 2 | 2005-05-31 |
Low Insertion Force Electrical Socket Contact App 20040224575 - BAKER, CRAIG H. ;   et al. | 2004-11-11 |
Cross-connection module providing for uninterruptible transmission during servicing Grant 5,496,192 - Hower , et al. March 5, 1 | 1996-03-05 |
Modular socket for an integrated circuit Grant 5,074,798 - Carter December 24, 1 | 1991-12-24 |
Zero insertion socket with normally closed contacts Grant 4,836,798 - Carter June 6, 1 | 1989-06-06 |
Socket device for fine pitch lead and leadless integrated circuit package Grant 4,789,345 - Carter December 6, 1 | 1988-12-06 |
Chip connector Grant 4,678,255 - Carter July 7, 1 | 1987-07-07 |
RAM connector Grant 4,669,796 - Carter June 2, 1 | 1987-06-02 |
Zero insertion force socket Grant 4,527,850 - Carter July 9, 1 | 1985-07-09 |
Connector assembly for mounting a module on a circuit board or the like Grant 4,386,815 - Carter , et al. June 7, 1 | 1983-06-07 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.