Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Carey; Richard A..The latest application filed is for "automated analysis system for a dyebath".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Automated analysis system for a dyebath Grant 6,753,956 - Clark , et al. June 22, 2 | 2004-06-22 |
Automated analysis system for a dyebath App 20020104171 - Clark, James Leonard ;   et al. | 2002-08-08 |
Method for automated dyebath reuse Grant 6,056,790 - Clark , et al. May 2, 2 | 2000-05-02 |
Poultry environmental control systems and methods Grant 5,482,210 - Carey , et al. January 9, 1 | 1996-01-09 |
Poultry environmental control systems and methods Grant 5,407,129 - Carey , et al. April 18, 1 | 1995-04-18 |
Method and apparatus for effecting efficient transmission of data Grant 5,241,565 - Kloc , et al. August 31, 1 | 1993-08-31 |
Apparatus for maximizing bus utilization Grant 4,543,629 - Carey , et al. September 24, 1 | 1985-09-24 |
Bus arbitration logic Grant 4,535,330 - Carey , et al. August 13, 1 | 1985-08-13 |
Write protected memory Grant 4,489,380 - Carey , et al. December 18, 1 | 1984-12-18 |
Apparatus for microprocessor address bus testing Grant 4,475,195 - Carey October 2, 1 | 1984-10-02 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.