CANYON CO., LTD.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for CANYON CO., LTD..The latest application filed is for "trigger type sprayer".
- CANYON CO., LTD. - Yamaguchi N/A JP
- CANYON CO., LTD. - Sanyo Onoda-shi Yamaguchi JP
- CANYON CO., LTD. - Sanyo Onoda-shi, Yamaguchi JP
- Canyon Co., Ltd. - Shinagawa-ku Tokyo JP
- Canyon Co., Ltd. - Tokyo JP
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Trigger type sprayer Grant 9,808,819 - Tada , et al. November 7, 2 | 2017-11-07 |
| Bayonet connection structure between container mouth portion and cap Grant 9,776,772 - Tada , et al. October 3, 2 | 2017-10-03 |
| Trigger Type Sprayer App 20150343472 - TADA; Tetsuya ; et al. | 2015-12-03 |
| Bayonet Connection Structure Between Container Mouth Portion And Cap App 20140110439 - Tada; Atsushi ; et al. | 2014-04-24 |
| Trigger type pump dispenser Grant 8,066,155 - Tada November 29, 2 | 2011-11-29 |
| Pump dispenser and spraying apparatus Grant 6,669,061 - Tada December 30, 2 | 2003-12-30 |
| Pump dispenser Grant D471,812 - Tada March 18, 2 | 2003-03-18 |
| Liquid discharging apparatus Grant 6,422,425 - Tada July 23, 2 | 2002-07-23 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 