loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Cahill; Stephen.The latest application filed is for "proximity detection using diversity path loss sampling".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Proximity detection using diversity path loss sampling Grant 9,014,644 - Cahill April 21, 2 | 2015-04-21 |
Telecommunications device localization and alarm Grant 8,750,855 - Cahill June 10, 2 | 2014-06-10 |
Multiple RF band operation in mobile devices Grant 8,712,467 - Clark , et al. April 29, 2 | 2014-04-29 |
Proximity Detection Using Diversity Path Loss Sampling App 20130344815 - Cahill; Stephen | 2013-12-26 |
Communications system with efficient multiprotocol-aware channel selection and interference avoidance Grant 8,583,138 - Cahill , et al. November 12, 2 | 2013-11-12 |
Communications system density and range improvement by signal-strength-directed channel class selection with weighting for minimum capacity consumption Grant 8,577,318 - Cahill November 5, 2 | 2013-11-05 |
Multiprotocol interference avoidance in monoprotocol radio communications system Grant 8,219,109 - Cahill July 10, 2 | 2012-07-10 |
Telecommunications Device Localization & Alarm App 20110312314 - Cahill; Stephen | 2011-12-22 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.