loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Cahill; Michael John.The latest application filed is for "package".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Scalloped cigarette packet Grant D503,827 - Cahill , et al. April 5, 2 | 2005-04-05 |
Rotary cutting and/or sealing mechanisms Grant 6,805,181 - Blundell , et al. October 19, 2 | 2004-10-19 |
Package App 20040112771 - Bailey, Thomas Williams ;   et al. | 2004-06-17 |
Rotary cutting and/or sealing mechanisms App 20030074797 - Blundell, Brian Francis ;   et al. | 2003-04-24 |
Apparatus and method for formation of sealed packages Grant 6,543,206 - Seward , et al. April 8, 2 | 2003-04-08 |
Rotary cutting and/or sealing mechanisms Grant 6,505,664 - Blundell , et al. January 14, 2 | 2003-01-14 |
Apparatus and method for formation of sealed packages App 20020023411 - Seward, David Robert ;   et al. | 2002-02-28 |
Apparatus And Method For Formation Of Sealed Packages App 20020023410 - SEAWARD, DAVID ROBERT ;   et al. | 2002-02-28 |
Printing method and apparatus Grant 6,171,429 - Aindow , et al. January 9, 2 | 2001-01-09 |
Packaging apparatus Grant 5,996,310 - Bailey , et al. December 7, 1 | 1999-12-07 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.