loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for CagEnt Technologies, Inc..The latest application filed is for "resolution enhancement for video display using multi-line interpolation".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Resolution enhancement for video display using multi-line interpolation Grant 6,191,772 - Mical , et al. February 20, 2 | 2001-02-20 |
Inverse Z-buffer and video display system having list-based control mechanism for time-deferred instructing of 3D rendering engine that also responds to supervisory immediate commands Grant 5,856,829 - Gray, III , et al. January 5, 1 | 1999-01-05 |
Multiple sequence MPEG decoder Grant 5,812,791 - Wasserman , et al. September 22, 1 | 1998-09-22 |
Optical disk with copy protection, and apparatus and method for recording and reproducing same Grant 5,809,006 - Davis , et al. September 15, 1 | 1998-09-15 |
Controlling a real-time rendering engine using a list-based control mechanism Grant 5,798,762 - Sfarti , et al. August 25, 1 | 1998-08-25 |
Process for controlling an MPEG decoder Grant 5,774,206 - Wasserman , et al. June 30, 1 | 1998-06-30 |
Digital signal processor architecture Grant 5,752,073 - Gray, III , et al. May 12, 1 | 1998-05-12 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.