loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Byrns; James E..The latest application filed is for "duck house".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Duck house Grant 4,889,075 - Byrns December 26, 1 | 1989-12-26 |
Insulated can holder Grant D304,538 - Byrns November 14, 1 | 1989-11-14 |
Insulated bottle holder Grant D302,509 - Byrns August 1, 1 | 1989-08-01 |
Portable lantern Grant D296,828 - Byrns July 19, 1 | 1988-07-19 |
Blow molded drawer front Grant 4,732,430 - Byrns March 22, 1 | 1988-03-22 |
Utility tray having foldable handle Grant 4,720,021 - Byrns January 19, 1 | 1988-01-19 |
Insulated bottle holder Grant 4,708,254 - Byrns November 24, 1 | 1987-11-24 |
Blow-molded three section storage case Grant 4,703,853 - Byrns November 3, 1 | 1987-11-03 |
Insulated can holder Grant 4,671,424 - Byrns June 9, 1 | 1987-06-09 |
Molded container case with hinge and method for making same Grant 4,615,464 - Byrns October 7, 1 | 1986-10-07 |
Saw blade storage cover Grant 4,611,713 - Byrns September 16, 1 | 1986-09-16 |
Welding rod case Grant D282,884 - Byrns March 11, 1 | 1986-03-11 |
Combined stadium seat and tray Grant D273,926 - Byrns , et al. May 22, 1 | 1984-05-22 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.