loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Busch; Charles R..The latest application filed is for "park lock system".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Transmission and clutch system Grant 7,406,888 - Busch , et al. August 5, 2 | 2008-08-05 |
Park lock system Grant 7,311,016 - Busch , et al. December 25, 2 | 2007-12-25 |
Transmission and clutch system App 20070089553 - Busch; Charles R. ;   et al. | 2007-04-26 |
Park lock system App 20070089552 - Busch; Charles R. ;   et al. | 2007-04-26 |
Position compensating differential locking mechanism Grant 7,048,668 - Busch , et al. May 23, 2 | 2006-05-23 |
Position compensating differential locking mechanism App 20050090357 - Busch, Charles R. ;   et al. | 2005-04-28 |
Position compensating differential locking mechanism Grant 6,835,155 - Busch , et al. December 28, 2 | 2004-12-28 |
Position compensating differential locking mechanism App 20040116236 - Busch, Charles R. ;   et al. | 2004-06-17 |
Method and apparatus for feeding and accumulating ribbon material Grant 4,591,084 - Balian , et al. May 27, 1 | 1986-05-27 |
Multi-layer filter dust bag for a vacuum cleaner Grant 4,116,648 - Busch September 26, 1 | 1978-09-26 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.