Building Robotics, Inc.
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Building Robotics, Inc.. Building Robotics, Inc. has 2 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "BRIVARA"
- Company Aliases
- Building Robotics, Inc.
- Building Robotics, Inc. - Oakland CA US
| State Incorporated | DELAWARE |
| Entity Type | CORPORATION |
| Address | 1504 Franklin Street, Suit 200 Oakland, CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES 94612 |
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| EMERGENCY LIGHTING CONTROL BYPASS 20220278549 - 17/186799 Gershowitz; Michael N. ; et al. | 2022-09-01 |
| SYSEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING SENSORS 20220272490 - 17/184334 Mohan; Tanuj ; et al. | 2022-08-25 |
| SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING DYNAMIC BUILDING INTERFACES 20220067855 - 17/004754 Dawson-Haggerty; Stephen ; et al. | 2022-03-03 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"BRIVARA" 97261482 |
BRIVARA 2022-02-10 |
"COMFY" 5243768 86817899 |
COMFY 2015-11-12 |
| NCAGE Code | 6Y0P8 | BUILDING ROBOTICS, INC. |
| CAGE Code | 6Y0P8 | BUILDING ROBOTICS, INC. |
| DUNS | 078694170 | Building Robotics, Inc. |
| SEC | 0001620662 | Building Robotics, Inc. of DELAWARE |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 