Brownell; Keith H.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Brownell; Keith H..The latest application filed is for "fungicidal pyridyl imidates".
- Brownell; Keith H. - San Jose CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Fungicidal pyridyl imidates Grant 5,019,565 - Baker , et al. May 28, 1 | 1991-05-28 |
| Fungicidal N-(substituted thio)-pyridyl cyclopropane carboxamides Grant 4,977,164 - Baker , et al. December 11, 1 | 1990-12-11 |
| Fungicidal pyridyl cyclopropane carboximides Grant 4,914,115 - Baker , et al. April 3, 1 | 1990-04-03 |
| Fungicidal pyridyl cyclopropane carboxamidines Grant 4,831,044 - Baker , et al. May 16, 1 | 1989-05-16 |
| Fungicidal pyridyl iminocarbonates Grant 4,824,854 - Baker , et al. April 25, 1 | 1989-04-25 |
| Fungicidal pyridyl carbamates Grant 4,797,407 - Baker , et al. January 10, 1 | 1989-01-10 |
| Fungicidal pyridyl cyclopropane carboximides Grant 4,767,772 - Baker , et al. August 30, 1 | 1988-08-30 |
| Fungicidal N-(substituted thio)-pyridyl cyclopropane carboxamides Grant 4,766,135 - Baker , et al. August 23, 1 | 1988-08-23 |
| Fungicidal pyridyl cyclopropane carboxamides Grant 4,766,134 - Baker , et al. August 23, 1 | 1988-08-23 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 