loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Brown; Gregory G..The latest application filed is for "nuclear fertility restorer genes and methods of use in plants".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Nuclear fertility restorer genes and methods of use in plants Grant 7,314,971 - Brown , et al. January 1, 2 | 2008-01-01 |
Nuclear fertility restorer genes and methods of use in plants Grant 7,071,375 - Brown , et al. July 4, 2 | 2006-07-04 |
Method for enhancement of naturally occurring cytoplasmic male sterility and for restoration of male sterility and for restoration of male fertility and uses thereof in hybrid crop production Grant 6,951,970 - Brown October 4, 2 | 2005-10-04 |
Nuclear fertility restorer genes and methods of use in plants App 20030237112 - Brown, Gregory G. ;   et al. | 2003-12-25 |
Nuclear fertility restorer genes and methods of use in plants App 20030126646 - Brown, Gregory G. ;   et al. | 2003-07-03 |
Method for enhancement of naturally occurring cytoplasmic male sterility and for restoration of male sterility and for restoration of male fertility and uses thereof in hybrid crop production App 20020100078 - Brown, Gregory G. | 2002-07-25 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.