Trademark applications and grants for Boyd, Darius Eugene. Boyd, Darius Eugene has 2 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "AWAKEN FAITH SUPPLY"
State Incorporated | |
Entity Type | |
Address | 8608 Old Potters Rd Charlotte, NORTH CAROLINA UNITED STATES 28269 |
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
Vaporizer Device 20210015157 - 16/832387 Bleloch; Andrew L. ;   et al. | 2021-01-21 |
Vaporizer Device 20190000145 - 16/053220 Bleloch; Andrew L. ;   et al. | 2019-01-03 |
OPTICALLY SWITCHED GRAPHENE/4H-SiC JUNCTION BIPOLAR TRANSISTOR 20160315211 - 15/049743 Chandrashekhar; MVS ;   et al. | 2016-10-27 |
VAPORIZER DEVICE 20150320116 - 14/710136 Bleloch; Andrew L. ;   et al. | 2015-11-12 |
Vaporizer device 10,631,574 - 16/053,220 Bleloch , et al. | 2020-04-28 |
Vaporizer device 10,201,185 - 14/710,136 Bleloch , et al. Feb | 2019-02-12 |
Optically switched graphene/4H-SiC junction bipolar transistor 9,966,491 - 15/049,743 Chandrashekhar , et al. May 8, 2 | 2018-05-08 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
![]() "AWAKEN FAITH SUPPLY" 97689129 |
AWAKEN FAITH SUPPLY 2022-11-22 |
![]() "MONEY MAN ENT." 77222509 |
MONEY MAN ENT. 2007-07-05 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.