Brock; Raymond G.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Brock; Raymond G..The latest application filed is for "projectile-weapon reticle with holdover aiming features for multiple projectile velocities".
- Brock; Raymond G. - Beaverton OR
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Projectile-weapon reticle with holdover aiming features for multiple projectile velocities Grant 9,435,610 - Silvers , et al. September 6, 2 | 2016-09-06 |
| Reticle for a riflescope or other projectile-weapon aiming device Grant D753,785 - Silvers , et al. April 12, 2 | 2016-04-12 |
| Projectile-weapon Reticle With Holdover Aiming Features For Multiple Projectile Velocities App 20150354921 - Silvers; Robert ; et al. | 2015-12-10 |
| Projectile-weapon reticle with holdover aiming features for multiple projectile velocities Grant 9,038,307 - Silvers , et al. May 26, 2 | 2015-05-26 |
| Projectile-weapon Reticle With Holdover Aiming Features For Multiple Projectile Velocities App 20140373424 - Silvers; Robert ; et al. | 2014-12-25 |
| Reticle for a riflescope or other projectile-weapon aiming device Grant D709,588 - Silvers , et al. July 22, 2 | 2014-07-22 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 