loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Bright; James Alan.The latest application filed is for "exhaust gas heat recovery heat exchanger having a lobed tube coil".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Internal heat exchanger assembly Grant 9,587,888 - Wolfe, IV , et al. March 7, 2 | 2017-03-07 |
Exhaust gas heat recovery heat exchanger having a lobed tube coil Grant 8,978,745 - Koo , et al. March 17, 2 | 2015-03-17 |
Air conditioning system having an improved internal heat exchanger Grant 8,596,080 - Wolfe, IV , et al. December 3, 2 | 2013-12-03 |
Exhaust Gas Heat Recovery Heat Exchanger Having A Lobed Tube Coil App 20130112371 - KOO; JAMES J. ;   et al. | 2013-05-09 |
Air Conditioning System Having An Improved Internal Heat Exchanger App 20110289959 - Wolfe, IV; Edward ;   et al. | 2011-12-01 |
Thermosiphon for laptop computers comprising a boiling chamber with a square wave partition Grant 7,770,632 - Bhatti , et al. August 10, 2 | 2010-08-10 |
Internal Heat Exchanger Assembly App 20100018246 - Wolfe, IV; Edward ;   et al. | 2010-01-28 |
Thermosiphon for laptop computers comprising a boiling chamber with a square wave partition App 20090078396 - Bhatti; Mohinder Singh ;   et al. | 2009-03-26 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.