loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Bremer; Ross L..The latest application filed is for "posterior lumbar lordosis orthotic device".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Posterior lumbar lordosis orthotic device Grant 6,702,770 - Bremer , et al. March 9, 2 | 2004-03-09 |
Posterior lumbar lordosis orthotic device App 20030181839 - Bremer, Ross L. ;   et al. | 2003-09-25 |
Skull closure device and procedure Grant 6,022,351 - Bremer , et al. February 8, 2 | 2000-02-08 |
Thoracal lumbosacral orthosis for a human torso Grant 5,718,670 - Bremer February 17, 1 | 1998-02-17 |
Apparatus and methods for elevating a patient to facilitate X-ray photography Grant 5,287,577 - Bremer , et al. February 22, 1 | 1994-02-22 |
Halo vest and lining Grant 5,261,873 - Bremer , et al. November 16, 1 | 1993-11-16 |
Shaped halo vest Grant 5,121,741 - Bremer , et al. June 16, 1 | 1992-06-16 |
Radiolucent transport and diagnostic procedure board Grant 4,854,305 - Bremer August 8, 1 | 1989-08-08 |
Apparatus for positioning and supporting a patient for spinal surgery Grant 4,840,362 - Bremer , et al. June 20, 1 | 1989-06-20 |
Halo for stereotaxic applications Grant 4,475,550 - Bremer , et al. October 9, 1 | 1984-10-09 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.