loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Brazelton; Carl L..The latest application filed is for "valve with independent control of discharge through plurality of orifices".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Valve with independent control of discharge through plurality of orifices Grant 5,316,031 - Brazelton , et al. May 31, 1 | 1994-05-31 |
Polymer activation apparatus Grant 5,284,626 - Brazelton , et al. February 8, 1 | 1994-02-08 |
Polymer activation apparatus Grant 5,164,429 - Brazelton , et al. November 17, 1 | 1992-11-17 |
Methods and apparatus for treating wastewater Grant 5,135,968 - Brazelton , et al. August 4, 1 | 1992-08-04 |
Polymer activation apparatus Grant 5,061,456 - Brazelton , et al. October 29, 1 | 1991-10-29 |
Portable mixing apparatus Grant 4,981,367 - Brazelton January 1, 1 | 1991-01-01 |
Mixing apparatus Grant 4,778,280 - Brazelton October 18, 1 | 1988-10-18 |
Mixing apparatus Grant 4,688,945 - Brazelton , et al. August 25, 1 | 1987-08-25 |
Mixing and feeding apparatus Grant 4,522,502 - Brazelton June 11, 1 | 1985-06-11 |
Aquatic exercise facility for animals Grant 4,197,815 - Brazelton April 15, 1 | 1980-04-15 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.