Brazas; John C.

Patent Applications and Registrations

Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Brazas; John C..The latest application filed is for "printhead including reinforced liquid chamber".

Company Profile

0.16.10

Brazas; John C. - Hilton NY US
Brazas; John C. - Rochester NY

*profile and listings may contain filings by different individuals or companies with the same name. Review application materials to confirm ownership/assignment.

Patent Activity

Patent	Date
Printhead including port after filter Grant 8,523,327 - Vaeth , et al. September 3, 2	2013-09-03
Printhead including reinforced liquid chamber Grant 8,465,140 - Rike , et al. June 18, 2	2013-06-18
Liquid chamber reinforcement in contact with filter Grant 8,465,141 - Rike , et al. June 18, 2	2013-06-18
Ink jet break-off length measurement apparatus and method Grant 8,226,199 - Hawkins , et al. July 24, 2	2012-07-24
Liquid Chamber Reinforcement In Contact With Filter App 20120050428 - Rike; Charles D. ; et al.	2012-03-01
Printhead Including Reinforced Liquid Chamber App 20120050427 - Rike; Charles D. ; et al.	2012-03-01
Continuous printhead contoured gas flow device Grant 8,091,990 - Nelson , et al. January 10, 2	2012-01-10
Printhead Including Port After Filter App 20110205319 - Vaeth; Kathleen M. ; et al.	2011-08-25
Continuous Printhead Contoured Gas Flow Device App 20090295879 - Nelson; David J. ; et al.	2009-12-03
Ink Jet Break-off Length Measurement Apparatus And Method App 20090027459 - Hawkins; Gilbert A. ; et al.	2009-01-29
Ink jet break-off length measurement apparatus and method Grant 7,434,919 - Hawkins , et al. October 14, 2	2008-10-14
Unpolished optical element with periodic surface roughness Grant 7,249,853 - Weller-Brophy , et al. July 31, 2	2007-07-31
Ink jet break-off length measurement apparatus and method App 20070064037 - Hawkins; Gilbert A. ; et al.	2007-03-22
Unpolished optical element with periodic surface roughness App 20060232748 - Weller-Brophy; Laura A. ; et al.	2006-10-19
Electro-mechanical grating device having a continuously controllable diffraction efficiency Grant 6,750,998 - Kruschwitz , et al. June 15, 2	2004-06-15
System and method for calibration of display system with linear array modulator Grant 6,611,380 - Kowarz , et al. August 26, 2	2003-08-26
System And Method For Calibration Of Display System With Linear Array Modulator App 20030117711 - Kowarz, Marek W. ; et al.	2003-06-26
Electro-mechanical grating device having a continuously controllable diffraction efficiency App 20030058514 - Kruschwitz, Brian E. ; et al.	2003-03-27
Color Scannerless Range Imaging System Using An Electromechanical Grating App 20030021599 - Brazas, John C. ; et al.	2003-01-30
Method and system for calibrating a diffractive grating modulator Grant 6,479,811 - Kruschwitz , et al. November 12, 2	2002-11-12
Laser detector grating unit (LDGU) for producing focus error, a push-pull tracking error, and differential phase tracking error signals Grant 5,856,961 - Brazas , et al. January 5, 1	1999-01-05
Segmented waveguide gratings used as optical recording sensors Grant 5,471,548 - Brazas November 28, 1	1995-11-28
Pick-up device for optical disk readout using waveguide gratings Grant 5,453,961 - Brazas September 26, 1	1995-09-26

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.