Boutmy; Patrick E.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Boutmy; Patrick E..The latest application filed is for "television channel distribution network".
- Boutmy; Patrick E. - Paris FR
- Boutmy; Patrick E. - Lannion FR
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Television channel distribution network Grant 4,616,256 - Boutmy October 7, 1 | 1986-10-07 |
| Supplementary information transmitting arrangement for a digital data transmission system Grant 4,387,460 - Boutmy , et al. June 7, 1 | 1983-06-07 |
| Monitoring system for telecommunication links equipped with repeaters-regenerators Grant 4,334,303 - Bertin , et al. June 8, 1 | 1982-06-08 |
| Digital multiplexing and demultiplexing system Grant 4,196,315 - Boutmy , et al. April 1, 1 | 1980-04-01 |
| Remote locating system for transmission faults in data transmission line having regenerative repeaters Grant 4,187,415 - Boutmy , et al. February 5, 1 | 1980-02-05 |
| Digital multiplexing system Grant 3,987,248 - Platet , et al. October 19, 1 | 1976-10-19 |
| Regenerative Repeater Output Stage For Bipolar Coded Message Signals Grant 3,818,360 - Boutmy , et al. June 18, 1 | 1974-06-18 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 