Boucher; Beatrice
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Boucher; Beatrice.The latest application filed is for "method for manufacturing footwear, footwear produced using said method, and machine for manufacturing footwear".
- Boucher; Beatrice - Chilly FR
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Footwear item having a simplified structure Grant 10,631,594 - Boucher , et al. | 2020-04-28 |
| Method for making a hollow object Grant 10,112,357 - Boucher , et al. October 30, 2 | 2018-10-30 |
| Method For Manufacturing Footwear, Footwear Produced Using Said Method, And Machine For Manufacturing Footwear App 20170340064 - BOUCHER; Beatrice ; et al. | 2017-11-30 |
| Article Of Footwear With Improved Structure App 20170208900 - BOUCHER; Beatrice ; et al. | 2017-07-27 |
| Article Of Footwear With Improved Structure App 20170181501 - GAUTIER; Gerard ; et al. | 2017-06-29 |
| Method For Making A Hollow Object App 20160185062 - BOUCHER; Beatrice ; et al. | 2016-06-30 |
| Shoe Made From A Sock And A Reinforcing Structure App 20150342261 - BOUCHER; Beatrice ; et al. | 2015-12-03 |
| Footwear Item Having A Simplified Structure App 20150313316 - BOUCHER; Beatrice ; et al. | 2015-11-05 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 