Bottger; Hans Joachim Dietrich
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Bottger; Hans Joachim Dietrich.The latest application filed is for "pipe running tool".
- Bottger; Hans Joachim Dietrich - Den Helder NL
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Pipe running tool Grant 8,037,949 - Juhasz , et al. October 18, 2 | 2011-10-18 |
| Pipe Running Tool App 20100200215 - Juhasz; Daniel ; et al. | 2010-08-12 |
| Pipe running tool having internal gripper Grant 7,753,138 - Juhasz , et al. July 13, 2 | 2010-07-13 |
| Pipe Running Tool Having A Primary Load Path App 20100155140 - Juhasz; Daniel ; et al. | 2010-06-24 |
| Pipe running tool having a primary load path Grant 7,699,121 - Juhasz , et al. April 20, 2 | 2010-04-20 |
| Pipe running tool having a cement path Grant 7,510,006 - Juhasz , et al. March 31, 2 | 2009-03-31 |
| Pipe running tool having a primary load path App 20060124293 - Juhasz; Daniel ; et al. | 2006-06-15 |
| Pipe running tool having a cement path App 20060124305 - Juhasz; Daniel ; et al. | 2006-06-15 |
| Pipe running tool having internal gripper App 20060118293 - Juhasz; Daniel ; et al. | 2006-06-08 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 