loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Bonnet; Ludwig.The latest application filed is for "trocar sleeve".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Trocar sleeve Grant 8,545,448 - Boebel , et al. October 1, 2 | 2013-10-01 |
Endoscopic instrument Grant 8,152,794 - Knodel , et al. April 10, 2 | 2012-04-10 |
Endoscopic instrument having a rotatably mounted and detachable coupling part Grant 8,118,729 - Hipp , et al. February 21, 2 | 2012-02-21 |
Trocar Sleeve App 20110160672 - BOEBEL; Manfred ;   et al. | 2011-06-30 |
Endoscopic Instrument App 20070135807 - KNODEL; Frank ;   et al. | 2007-06-14 |
Endoscopic instrument App 20060063975 - Hipp; Klaus-Peter ;   et al. | 2006-03-23 |
Endoscopic instrument App 20050267448 - Bonnet, Ludwig ;   et al. | 2005-12-01 |
Resectoscope Grant 6,824,544 - Boebel , et al. November 30, 2 | 2004-11-30 |
Resectoscope App 20030181906 - Boebel, Manfred ;   et al. | 2003-09-25 |
Bipolar forceps Grant 6,482,205 - Bonnet November 19, 2 | 2002-11-19 |
Transurethral dissection electrode Grant 6,447,509 - Bonnet , et al. September 10, 2 | 2002-09-10 |
Electrode for vaporizing tissue Grant 5,827,274 - Bonnet , et al. October 27, 1 | 1998-10-27 |
Injection device Grant 5,685,853 - Bonnet November 11, 1 | 1997-11-11 |
Endoscope Grant 5,674,179 - Bonnet , et al. October 7, 1 | 1997-10-07 |
Endoscopic instrument Grant 5,509,892 - Bonnet April 23, 1 | 1996-04-23 |
Instrument for lithotripsy Grant 5,312,418 - Bonnet May 17, 1 | 1994-05-17 |
Endoscope having a camera coupled thereto Grant 5,307,804 - Bonnet May 3, 1 | 1994-05-03 |
Resectoscope Grant 5,135,524 - Bonnet August 4, 1 | 1992-08-04 |
Endoscope for laser lithotripsy Grant 5,095,889 - Weissmuller , et al. March 17, 1 | 1992-03-17 |
Uretero-renoscope Grant 5,031,603 - Gautier , et al. July 16, 1 | 1991-07-16 |
Instrument for slitting stenoses in bodily passages Grant 4,712,547 - Bonnet December 15, 1 | 1987-12-15 |
Instrument for endoscopic operations Grant 4,686,965 - Bonnet , et al. August 18, 1 | 1987-08-18 |
Catheter for widening a puncture channel Grant 4,686,984 - Bonnet August 18, 1 | 1987-08-18 |
Uretero-renoscope Grant 4,685,449 - Bonnet August 11, 1 | 1987-08-11 |
Instrument insert for a uretero-renoscope Grant 4,653,476 - Bonnet March 31, 1 | 1987-03-31 |
Uretero-renoscope Grant 4,630,598 - Bonnet December 23, 1 | 1986-12-23 |
Device for disintegrating stones in bodily cavities or ducts Grant 4,606,330 - Bonnet August 19, 1 | 1986-08-19 |
Piezoelectric transducer with curved shafts Grant 4,561,438 - Bonnet , et al. December 31, 1 | 1985-12-31 |
Ultrasonic piezoelectric disintegrater Grant 4,486,680 - Bonnet , et al. December 4, 1 | 1984-12-04 |
Coupling member for coupling an optical system to an endoscope shaft Grant 4,452,546 - Hiltebrandt , et al. June 5, 1 | 1984-06-05 |
Resectoscopes Grant 4,430,996 - Bonnet February 14, 1 | 1984-02-14 |
Endoscopes Grant 4,250,873 - Bonnet February 17, 1 | 1981-02-17 |
Endoscopes Grant 4,137,920 - Bonnet February 6, 1 | 1979-02-06 |
Single or double-shank cutting loop device for resectoscopes Grant 4,060,087 - Hiltebrandt , et al. November 29, 1 | 1977-11-29 |
Resectoscopes Grant 4,024,869 - Bonnet May 24, 1 | 1977-05-24 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.