Bodkin; Michael A.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Bodkin; Michael A..The latest application filed is for "condition-based monitoring system for machinery and associated methods".
- Bodkin; Michael A. - Orlando FL
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Quantifying a condition with a neural network Grant 9,239,983 - Harrison , et al. January 19, 2 | 2016-01-19 |
| Systems and methods for estimating a remaining useful life of an item Grant 9,002,775 - Harrison , et al. April 7, 2 | 2015-04-07 |
| Adaptive learning network for fusion of remaining useful life with machinery condition Grant 8,903,750 - Bodkin , et al. December 2, 2 | 2014-12-02 |
| Integrating disparate programming languages to form a new programming language Grant 8,806,453 - Bodkin , et al. August 12, 2 | 2014-08-12 |
| System and method for estimating remaining useful life Grant 8,781,982 - Das , et al. July 15, 2 | 2014-07-15 |
| Condition-based monitoring system for machinery and associated methods Grant 8,332,337 - Harrison , et al. December 11, 2 | 2012-12-11 |
| Condition-Based Monitoring System For Machinery And Associated Methods App 20100114806 - Harrison; Gregory A. ; et al. | 2010-05-06 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 