Binkley; K. Brent
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Binkley; K. Brent.The latest application filed is for "optical device venting gaps for edge sealant and lamination dam".
- Binkley; K. Brent - Plantation FL
- Binkley; K. Brent - Lake Mary FL
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Optical Device Venting Gaps For Edge Sealant And Lamination Dam App 20210311298 - Xing; Wendong ; et al. | 2021-10-07 |
| Intelligent electronic device with powering options for the display when not in use Grant 9,778,732 - Karandikar , et al. October 3, 2 | 2017-10-03 |
| Intelligent Electronic Device For Outdoor Environment With Powering Options For The Display When Not In Use App 20160239078 - Karandikar; Harshavardhan M. ; et al. | 2016-08-18 |
| High-power fused collimator and associated methods Grant 7,397,985 - Tinch , et al. July 8, 2 | 2008-07-08 |
| High-Power Fused Collimator and Associated Methods App 20070196046 - Tinch; David A. ; et al. | 2007-08-23 |
| High-power fused collimator and associated methods Grant 7,146,075 - Tinch , et al. December 5, 2 | 2006-12-05 |
| High-power fused collimator and associated methods App 20060088243 - Tinch; David A. ; et al. | 2006-04-27 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 