loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Billard; Max Holland.The latest application filed is for "removable split cannula for placement of electrodes".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Removable Split Cannula For Placement Of Electrodes App 20220265335 - Billard; Max Holland ;   et al. | 2022-08-25 |
Rigid Sternal Fixation App 20220249144 - O'Brien, II; Todd Shay ;   et al. | 2022-08-11 |
Nested Hard Tissue Replacement Implants App 20220175533 - Billard; Max Holland ;   et al. | 2022-06-09 |
End effector coupler for surgical arm Grant 10,835,345 - Billard , et al. November 17, 2 | 2020-11-17 |
End effector coupler for surgical arm Grant 10,792,124 - Billard , et al. October 6, 2 | 2020-10-06 |
End effector coupler for surgical arm Grant 10,772,704 - Garcia , et al. Sept | 2020-09-15 |
Flexible Cartilage Replacement App 20200197057 - Billard; Max Holland ;   et al. | 2020-06-25 |
Contourable Plate App 20200188000 - Ghobadi; Shahin ;   et al. | 2020-06-18 |
End Effector Coupler For Surgical Arm App 20190274778 - Billard; Max Holland ;   et al. | 2019-09-12 |
End Effector Coupler For Surgical Arm App 20190274777 - Garcia; Saddy ;   et al. | 2019-09-12 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.